Free Essays on Young Goodman

In the Gospel of St. Matthew, chapter 27 A-B, the people are given the traditional release of one prisoner. They have a choice, the just man Jesus Christ and the â€Å"notable† prisoner Barabbas. When asked which prisoner should be released the people responded, â€Å"Barabbas.† (convinced by the chief priests and elders.) Pontius Pilate asks what punishment he should be given. â€Å"They all responded: Let him be crucified.† Disturbed by the obvious injustice, Pilate feebly asks, â€Å"What evil hath he done?† The people rise in blind, tumultuous cries, â€Å"Let him be crucified!† Again, Pilate appeals to them by washing his hands before the people and saying, â€Å"I am innocent of the blood of this just person.† The impassioned crowd, the tumult rising, calls the accountability upon themselves, â€Å"His blood be on us, and on our children!† Bach captures the horrific nature of this event exquisitely in â€Å"The St. Matthew Passi on.† The chorus explodes into rising human voices, violently one upon the other, in a terrifying spectacle of mob mentality. The listener is disturbed; the wrongness of it frightens and saddens him. This is an example of a mass human sentiment. It is undeniably immoral and frightening in its intensity. The people are aroused beyond even what they have been convinced of, to the point of willfully taking the guilt of innocent blood onto the whole human race. What is this phenomena? To a rational individual, the passion of the masses is not only illogical, but depraved and evil; it is the product of an emotional momentum with nothing inherent in it to check its behavior. While, undoubtedly, a zealous mass sentiment could possibly work for a good thing, what is to insure that it will? A mass of humans has no collective moral conscious; there is no set of laws that it obeys, neither head nor heart exists to serve as guide. In the Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx uses caustic and powe rfully persuasive rhetoric to inflame t... Free Essays on Young Goodman Free Essays on Young Goodman In the Gospel of St. Matthew, chapter 27 A-B, the people are given the traditional release of one prisoner. They have a choice, the just man Jesus Christ and the â€Å"notable† prisoner Barabbas. When asked which prisoner should be released the people responded, â€Å"Barabbas.† (convinced by the chief priests and elders.) Pontius Pilate asks what punishment he should be given. â€Å"They all responded: Let him be crucified.† Disturbed by the obvious injustice, Pilate feebly asks, â€Å"What evil hath he done?† The people rise in blind, tumultuous cries, â€Å"Let him be crucified!† Again, Pilate appeals to them by washing his hands before the people and saying, â€Å"I am innocent of the blood of this just person.† The impassioned crowd, the tumult rising, calls the accountability upon themselves, â€Å"His blood be on us, and on our children!† Bach captures the horrific nature of this event exquisitely in â€Å"The St. Matthew Passi on.† The chorus explodes into rising human voices, violently one upon the other, in a terrifying spectacle of mob mentality. The listener is disturbed; the wrongness of it frightens and saddens him. This is an example of a mass human sentiment. It is undeniably immoral and frightening in its intensity. The people are aroused beyond even what they have been convinced of, to the point of willfully taking the guilt of innocent blood onto the whole human race. What is this phenomena? To a rational individual, the passion of the masses is not only illogical, but depraved and evil; it is the product of an emotional momentum with nothing inherent in it to check its behavior. While, undoubtedly, a zealous mass sentiment could possibly work for a good thing, what is to insure that it will? A mass of humans has no collective moral conscious; there is no set of laws that it obeys, neither head nor heart exists to serve as guide. In the Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx uses caustic and powe rfully persuasive rhetoric to inflame t...

The Definition of the Phrase Slut Shaming

The Definition of the Phrase Slut Shaming ÑSlut shaming is the deliberate act of calling a woman a slut, a whore or impugning her character in sexual terms in order to embarrass, humiliate, intimidate, degrade or shame her for actions or behaviors that are a normal part of female sexuality. Although the act of slut-shaming is not exclusive to either gender, females of every age from girls to adults often engage in slut-shaming to put down or express contempt for another female. Slut-shaming is often associated with mean girl behavior but is not restricted to that age group. A slut-shaming story from a personal blog illustrates how this practice can happen in the unlikeliest of settings: [O]ne church member...called another member a slut because of the latter’s shoes (which had been part of a Halloween costume) with stiletto heels. It was a joke...[which] hints at the truth...that even if you are a good Christian, if you also happen to be wearing certain clothes, you will be stigmatized sexually if you are a woman. Slut shaming entered the public consciousness in 2010 due to two separate events: the suicide of Phoebe Prince, a high school student who was so humiliated by her classmates that she hanged herself; and the 2010 midterm election in which two Congressional candidates, Christine ODonnell, and Krystal Ball, were attacked by the website Gawker which published an anonymous tell-all about a night spent with ODonnell and candid photos of Ball at a Christmas party posing with sex toys. Slut shaming was also depicted in the CBS series The Good Wife when a female candidates breast augmentation surgery was revealed by her male opponent. In the episode which originally aired November 9, 2010, the candidate directly addressed the situation and revealed she was a breast cancer survivor who had kept her double mastectomy a secret and was having breast reconstructive surgery following cancer treatment.